As someone who has spent the past several months studying and reading about campaigns, I appreciate the comparison between campaigns and movements. This topic has not been covered in the journal articles, textbooks and other resources that I’ve been reviewing. While I do agree with many of the points you articulated in your post, I see both—social movements and campaigns—as vehicles that lead to social change in society. Campaigns are an ordered, structured way to go about changing behavior, public opinion or perception in society. I think the same can be said about movements, but the difference is that movements are more organic, with many started at the grassroots level by individuals motivated to make change in society. Both campaigns and movements have goals and sometimes the organizers work to achieve their goals in similar ways. For example, the Occupy Wall Street movement relies heavily on social media to communicate with like-minded activists around the world who are interested in joining in the movement and fighting corporate greed. Many campaigns, including the CDC’s Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign, which has been running for more than a decade and aims to educate people about the importance of preventive cancer screenings, rely heavily on social media to communicate a social health or change to message to the public.
Depending on the intended outcome, I think both campaigns and movements serve a valuable role in helping to change society. I do agree with your point about movements being endless and definitely, in some cases, capable of greater change than campaigns. I think campaigns can lead to large-scale movements. I also think that people who create social movements use campaigns as one of the many tools in their arsenal to change behavior, attitudes or build political will.
]]>