Last week, I published a post on Health 2.0, based on a couple research studies that were recently released.
Before this article was published, the author put the draft version of the article in a wiki, and encouraged readers’ comments and edits…to help formulate the articles final version.
In this article, the author looks at the increasing use of social media within marketing, journalism, and politics – and how it can spread to the field of science, as more researchers increase their use of web 2.0 tools within their research. Some critics think that this new process to scientific discovery curbs the traditional institutional lines and poses danger. Advocates see Science 2.0 as a way to increase openness and collaboration across studies – furthering progress
Science 2.0 refers to the growing movement of integrating social media into the scientific process and its promotion. Science 2.0 is a component of the broader Open Science movement according to the author of the article, M. Mitchell Waldrop. This Open Science Movement includes other topics such as open-access scientific publishing and open-data practices.
The article points to a success project named OpenWetWare at MIT, which:
“OpenWetWare is an effort to promote the sharing of information, know-how, and wisdom among researchers and groups who are working in biology & biological engineering. OWW provides a place for labs, individuals, and groups to organize their own information and collaborate with others easily and efficiently.”
OpenWetWare now hosts more than 15 labs, 6100 web pages and is edited by 3000 registered users. To learn more, gain access, or get involved, you can contact the project at email@example.com or join here.
Due to the content of this budding use of technology, in that it is labeled ‘science’ brings many concerns to critics minds. These include:
- Privacy Concerns
- Authorship and Copyright
- Looking ‘unprofessional’
- Undermining the field of ‘science’
- Trust-worthiness of information and hackers
Despite concerns, advocates see Science 2.0 as still in its launching point. Future ideas for implementing Science 2.0 include:
- Collaborate for scientific articles and ideas
- online lab journals
- Developing internet-friendly lab equipment
- Virtual scientific conferences
- Virtual Labs
- Updated Lab ‘feeds’
- Truth-Based Social Marketing
- For more information regarding these ideas and more visit here.
- Duncan Hull wrote up an insightful blog post about science 2.0 by interviewing scientist and researcher Dave DeRoure. DeRoure mapped out what he thinks is a widening gap between scientists and the web infrastruture. You can read the post here.
- For those who like reading how trends relate, the Columbia Journalism Review wrote up a great article about web 2.0 and its evolution to Journalism 2.0 and Science 2.0, and how the two concepts relate. The author demonstrates how concerns towards the two fields are similar and the implications this has for science journalism 2.0.
What are your thoughts on Science 2.0?? A ‘yay’ or a ‘nay’ …share with us your thoughts